The guys at Legion Hardware have encoutered some overcloking issues with AMD’s Radeon HD 5970 during FurMark stress test. Few times ago, AMD has published some slides about the massive overcloking headroom of the Radeon HD 5970.
New Radeon HD 5000 series have a hardware protection against overheat (see this post): if the hardware detects a dangerous situation (overload) for the GPU or the VRM, the hardware will immediately throttle back the card by one PowerPlay level.
This is exactly what happened with the HD 5970 tortured by FurMark. With an overclocked core clock of 875MHz, the temperatures exceeded 100 degrees causing the throttling of both GPUs to 550MHz.
In order to avoid cooking itself, the Radeon HD 5970 throttles both cores down, negating any positive performance impact the overclock is going to have. However rather than throttle the cores down just a little, or even to the default operating specification, it drops the frequency to just 550MHz, that’s a 24% under clock on each core.
TG Daily has interviewed AMD’s Dave Baumann about this situation:
The Legion FurMark results tell me that the 5970 is doing exactly what it was designed to do. There are protection measures in place that kick in when thermal or power levels exceed maximum permitted levels, so the card was taking the correct actions to protect both itself and the motherboard.
Now, I would also like to note that this particular benchmark (FurMark) was coded primarily as a stress test. It is certainly not elective in how it utilizes the GPU, as the application basically lights up the entire card to create or emulate maximum power draws and scenarios. No real world app or game does that for an extended period of time. FurMark was lighting up everything, with average power draws exceeding the requirements of any standard app by 20-40 percent.
Expreview in its side has just received a HD 5970 and will test it with FurMark…
The slow down from 875MHz to 550MHz is maybe a little too much. I hope it can be tweaked by the driver (even if it’s a hardware protection) so next versions of Catalyst could improve this protection and find the right clock that will protect the hardware avoiding this big drop.
FurMark, still FurMark… the power of furry donut.
Next time I’ll add… two donuts 😉
Kudos to ATI, Sounds to me like they trying are protecting the users investment and their other system components…….
One could edit the 5970’s BIOS to increase that PowerPlay level’s core frequency.
Besides the underclock thing is good for beginner overclockers as it ensures that you can’t easily fry your GPU by overclocking.
So do you think it’d be possible to further stress these cards by using the tessellation hardware as well?
Well, throttling the card because of insufficient VRM is a bad approach, a very bad one!
They should design the VRM in such a way as for it to be able to handle such a situation.
On the other hand, having such a termal throttling is a great value added for the average user. If the fan fails or whatever, it is essential and very nice that the card won’t fry itself.
Every serious overclocker or enthusiast will put at least a fullcover waterblock on it, anyway… It would be sheer madness trying to overclock such a beast on air, sorry…
Likewise, it would be foolish to equip the card with an air cooler what could handle overclocking.
In fact, I would welcome the availability of bare cards, so I don’t end up with a useless piece of junk when I replace the air cooler with a fullcover waterblock.
Was this done at 100% fan speed ? Because my HD5970 is fully stable at those speeds , Furmark does stress the card more than any gaming application. At 930mhz on core and 1300 on mem with voltage at 1.2mV after a while of gaming at 1080p in Dirt 2 under the max DX11 settings its not even over 70 degrees celsius .
Pingback: Truth on GTX580 Furmark Temps and Consumption - Page 4 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
Pingback: [Tutorial] Graphics Cards Voltage Regulator Modules (VRM) Explained - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com